Menyang kontèn

Parembugan Wikipédia:Kacarakan

Konten halaman tidak didukung dalam bahasa lain.
Saka Wikipédia Jawa, bauwarna mardika basa Jawa

Jeneng

[besut sumber]

Nèk miturut aku sih istilah Jawané sing pas "Kadutan" utawa "Duta" waé. Mbokmenawa tembung "Caraka" uga apik :-) Meursault2004ngobrol 16:17, 27 Januari 2008 (UTC)

Wis tak cèk ing Kamus Basa Jawa (Bausastra Jawa) anggitan Tim Penyusun Balai Bahasa Yogyakarta, kasilé kaya mangkéné:
  • dhuta, ora ana
  • duta, caraka tegesé padha yakuwi utusan, kongkonan
  • Tembung Indonesia kedutaan, ora ana dasanamané.
Kamangka yèn nganggo tembung "duta" utawa "caraka" tegesé wong-é, dudu papan panggonané (kantor), yèn nganggo tembung "wisma duta" kuwi rak omah dinesé pak Dubes. Manawa sing paling cedhak ya "kadutan" kuwi mau mas. Nanging ana sawetara konotasi yakuwi: tembung "kadut" tegesé karung, dadi nèk "kadutan" aja nganti dianggep "karungan".
Sajroning wiki iki sing dikarepaké rak duta bahasa, piyé nèk ing wiki jv iki sauntara nganggo tembung "duta-basa", kanggo kantor lan wongé sisan?, bèn ora padha karo "duta" sing tenanan. Matur sembah nuwun. Prastitip pesen
Supaya wong-wong ora padha salah tampa, kepriyé nèk tembungé diganti dadi 'kacarakan'? Kaya papané wong-wong dhines sing kawuwuhan ater-ater ka- lan panambang -an kaya déné kalurahan, kacamatan, lsp. Uga tembung 'caraka' iku sak orané lumayan lumrah merga tembung kuwi ana ing panagram aksara Jawa lan diajaraké ing sekolahan. — Labdajiwa (rembugan) 14 Juli 2021 15.51 (UTC)[wangsuli]
Bisa waé Mas yèn arep nganggo tembung "Kacarakan". Wirjadisastra (rembugan) 15 Juli 2021 07.26 (UTC)[wangsuli]
Oké. Kacané wis daklih menyang Wikipedia:Kacarakan. — Labdajiwa (rembugan) 15 Juli 2021 11.30 (UTC)[wangsuli]
Kadutan iki ora ana Bahasa Indonesiané yå? Empu rembugan 13:57, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Cleaning up files

[besut sumber]

Hello!

I have noticed that there is a lot of unused files on jv.wikipedia: Mirunggan:Gambar_kang_ora_kaanggo

  • Non-free files are only allowed if they are in use so if they are not in use they should be deleted.
  • Free files are allowed even in unused but they need a source and an author so that it is possible to verify that the file is free. Uploader can fix missing source and author if uploader is still active. But if not the files should be deleted.
  • If a file have no license uploader could fix (if active). If not files should be deleted.

I noticed that MediaWiki:Licenses mention nc and nd and that is not allowed per wmf:Resolution:Licensing_policy so that should be removed as a suggested license. Also the latest version of creative commons is 4.0.

{{GFDL-self}} has disclaimers (Kedah selaras kanthi paugeran wonten ing penyangkalan.). That should be avoided per w:en:Wikipedia:GFDL standardization.

But only the copyright holder can remove. So I suggest to create {{GFDL-self-with-disclaimers}} and change all files to use that. Then remove the disclaimers from {{GFDL-self}} and ask uploader if they are willing to remove the disclaimers and change license back to {{GFDL-self}}.

It is easy to do with a bot if someone with a bot flag is active (184 items). If not I can do it. Since it is good if uploader notice the edit it could be relevant to edit without a bot flag. What do you think?

If a file have a free license and a good source and author it should be moved to Commons so that it can be used on other wikis.

According to Special:Statistics there are 5,452 files so it would be great if more than one user would help check the files :-) MGA73 (rembugan) 7 Juli 2024 10.50 (UTC)[wangsuli]

I have now created the template and changed some files so you can see how it looks. See the files in Kategori:Gambar kanthi lisensi mardika (GFDL)-with-disclaimers. I also noticed that the en:Wikipedia:Licensing update was not completed so I also did the license update for these files. Files that are updated now also use {{Cc-by-sa-3.0-migrated}}. I can fix all the files if I get a bot flag. User:Bennylin and User:Meursault2004 know my bot from id.wiki so perhaps you could let me know if you think that would be relevant that I request a bot flag here too? --MGA73 (rembugan) 28 Juli 2024 18.41 (UTC)[wangsuli]
I can also nominate unused files without a license or the invalid license {{Kapanlagi.com}} for deletion. I marked some as an example. --MGA73 (rembugan) 12 Agustus 2024 13.24 (UTC)[wangsuli]